Accounts of inclusive education that locate the concept of inclusion within theories of individual rights face two problems. The first problem, called ‘the dilemma of identity’, assumes that on one hand we need communities to develop and ensure a sense of identity and a feeling of social inclusion, whereas on the other hand, inclusion is only partly ensured via such forms of inclusion. Inclusion necessarily entails participation in societal goods such as education. The second issue is that those rights accounts do not take seriously the distinctive social nature of inclusion. In this article, I suggest a basic distinction between communal and societal inclusion that serves as a background for a fundamental suggestion: to conceptualise rights to inclusive education as part of an account of inclusion as a common good.

中文翻译：

---

全纳教育、身份困境和共同利益

在个人权利理论中定位包容性概念的包容性教育面临两个问题。第一个问题称为“身份困境”，它假设一方面我们需要社区发展并确保认同感和社会包容感，而另一方面，通过这种形式的包容。包容必然需要参与社会福利，例如教育。第二个问题是，这些权利账户没有认真对待包容的独特社会性质。在这篇文章中，我提出了社区包容和社会包容之间的基本区别，作为一个基本建议的背景：将包容性教育的权利概念化为包容作为共同利益的一部分。