rethink the ways we divide the history of Korea from the formation of the earliest states through to the twentieth century. The established periodization scheme, based on dynastic units such as Old Chosŏn 古朝鮮 (–108 BCE), Silla 新羅 (–935 CE), Koryŏ 高麗 (918–1392), Chosŏn 朝鮮 (1392–1910), and modern and contemporary Korea (1910–the present), may be convenient, but is problematic for numerous reasons. To begin, setting regime change as the line of demarcation places the explanatory burden of epochal transformation on Theme Issue: Bridging Korea, Old and New

中文翻译：

---

客座编辑介绍

重新思考我们如何划分韩国历史，从最早的国家形成到 20 世纪。既定的分期方案，基于王朝单位，如旧朝鲜古朝鲜（–108 BCE）、新罗新罗（–935 CE）、Koryŏ 高丽（918–1392）、朝鲜（1392–1910）以及现代和当代韩国（1910 年至今），可能很方便，但由于多种原因存在问题。首先，以政权更迭为分界线，将划时代转变的解释负担放在主题问题上：弥合韩国，新旧