Many higher education institutions (HEIs) have constructed their internal evaluation systems to secure teaching quality. This paper aims to analyze teaching quality, HEIs use students to evaluate their professors as they have direct contact with the professors during the whole semester. The authorities hope to receive valuable information, which can be used for many administrative purposes. The bias in the evaluation toward professors’ gender and attractiveness has already been proven. However, there is only limited evidence whether students give higher value to teaching quality over the professors’ personality.,In this paper, the authors go further in the gender-attractiveness evidence and put the evaluation in contrast with professors’ experience, age, etc.,The results indicate that the effect of experience predominates the effect of gender and in some areas also the effect of age. What is more, a semester in which a course is taken also influences the evaluation as different professors’ abilities are required in teaching in a different semester. On the other hand, the results do not fully confirm the effect of gender on the evaluation.,The results reveal that it is important to consider the course structure to assign professors to the right courses.

中文翻译：

---

教授的年龄和性别重要吗？还是学生赋予教授经验更高的价值？

许多高等教育机构（HEIs）已构建其内部评估系统以确保教学质量。本文旨在分析教学质量，在整个学期中，HEI利用学生来评估他们的教授，因为他们与教授直接接触。当局希望收到有价值的信息，这些信息可用于许多行政目的。评估对教授性别和吸引力的偏见已经得到证明。但是，只有很少的证据表明学生是否会比教授的人格赋予教学质量更高的价值。，本文作者在性别吸引力的证据上走得更远，并将评价与教授的经验，年龄等进行对比。 。，结果表明，经验的影响主要是性别的影响，在某些地区，年龄的影响也是如此。而且，一个学期的课程也会影响评估，因为在不同学期的教学中需要不同的教授的能力。另一方面，结果并未完全确认性别对评估的影响。结果表明，考虑课程结构以将教授分配给正确的课程很重要。