Abstract The transition and consolidation of the democratic regime in Argentina banished violence as a means of gaining access to state power. However, the frequent appearance of violent protests (“outbursts,” riots, looting or “puebladas,” among others) interrogates the persistence of violent collective actions and their relations with the dynamics of institutional policy in the current democratic framework. To what extent do these facts form part of the new repertoires of action, as several authors maintain? Are they actions that are an instrument of politics, or are they the expression of a radical opposition to the system? On the other hand, the emergence of a multiple and a fragmented form of violence go hand in hand with the emergence of illegalities of various kinds: the expansion of informal and illegal economies (the trade in drugs, weapons and people, among the main ones). The proven complicity of the state institutions in these processes also questions the relationship between politics and violence, although in a different register. Is it an institutional “flaw” or a new form of government? To what extent does such violence represent strategies of political accumulation?

中文翻译：

---

阿根廷的集体暴力与政治

摘要 阿根廷民主政权的过渡和巩固消除了暴力作为获得国家权力的手段。然而，频繁出现的暴力抗议（“爆发”、骚乱、抢劫或“镇压”等）质疑了暴力集体行动的持续存在及其与当前民主框架中制度政策动态的关系。正如几位作者所坚持的那样，这些事实在多大程度上构成了新行动的一部分？它们是作为政治工具的行动，还是对制度的激进反对的表达？另一方面，多重和分散的暴力形式的出现与各种非法行为的出现齐头并进：非正规和非法经济（毒品贸易、武器和人，在主要的之中）。国家机构在这些过程中被证实的共谋也对政治与暴力之间的关系提出了质疑，尽管在不同的记录中。它是制度上的“缺陷”还是一种新的政府形式？这种暴力在多大程度上代表了政治积累的策略？