Professors face increasingly diverse student bodies that exhibit divergent understandings and motivations to engage in academic dishonesty. Research suggests that collectivism/individualism is the cultural dimension underlying such differences. This study measures this dimension at the individual level using two constructs—agency-communion and self-construal—and their relationships to tolerance for academic cheating and unethical corporate behavior. Analyses show a positive relationship between tolerance for academic cheating and for unethical corporate behavior. Both measures of collectivism (interdependent self-construal and communion) exhibit positive relationships to tolerance for unethical business behavior, while interdependence is also positively related to tolerance for academic cheating.

中文翻译：

---

从教室到会议室的作弊容忍度：对潜在的个人和文化驱动因素的研究

教授们面临着越来越多样化的学生群体，他们对学术不诚实表现出不同的理解和动机。研究表明，集体主义/个人主义是造成这种差异的文化维度。这项研究使用两种构架（机构交流和自我建构）及其与学术作弊和不道德公司行为容忍度的关系，在个人层面上测量了这一维度。分析表明，对学术作弊的宽容和对不道德公司行为的正相关。集体主义的两种量度（相互依存的自我建构和共融）都表现出对不道德商业行为的容忍度呈正相关，而相互依存性也与学术作弊的容忍度呈正相关。