This paper addresses two key controversial questions to do with the concept of archetypes - do they operate autonomously without connection to an individual's personal life experience? Does their biological base mean they are genetically determined, innate and thus a priori inherited psychic structures? These questions are addressed through the case of a person who began life as an unwanted pregnancy, was adopted at birth and as an adult, experienced profound waking visions. An emergent/developmental model of archetype is outlined which stresses developmental start-points through this infant's engagement via response and reaction to the affective and material world of the infant/birth mother matrix and from which emergence later occurs by way of participation in a socio-cultural and material context. The emergentism aspect of this model rescues it from being reductionist since it allows for cultural and socialisation inputs. The model's explanatory power is vastly enlarged by combining this with the developmental component. Critically, once developmentally produced mind/brain (image schema) structures are in place, they have the capacity to generate psychological life. Imagery can then appear as if it is innately derived when that is not the case. The contemporary neuroscience which supports this model is both outlined and related back to the case example.

中文翻译：

---

围绕原型概念的争论以及涌现/发展模型的位置

本文解决了与原型概念有关的两个关键有争议的问题——它们是否在与个人个人生活经历无关的情况下自主运作？他们的生物学基础是否意味着他们是由基因决定的、先天的，因此是先天遗传的心理结构？这些问题是通过一个人的案例来解决的，他以意外怀孕开始生活，在出生时被收养，成年后经历了深刻的觉醒异象。概述了原型的涌现/发展模型，该模型强调通过该婴儿通过对婴儿/生母矩阵的情感和物质世界的反应和反应而参与的发展起点，并且随后通过参与社会-文化和物质环境。该模型的涌现主义方面将其从还原论中拯救出来，因为它允许文化和社会化投入。通过将其与发展组件相结合，该模型的解释力大大增强。至关重要的是，一旦发育产生的心智/大脑（意象图式）结构就位，它们就有能力产生心理生活。如果不是这种情况，那么图像就会看起来好像它是天生的。支持该模型的当代神经科学被概述并与案例相关联。他们有能力产生心理生活。如果不是这种情况，那么图像就会看起来好像它是天生的。支持该模型的当代神经科学被概述并与案例相关联。他们有能力产生心理生活。如果不是这种情况，那么图像就会看起来好像它是天生的。支持该模型的当代神经科学被概述并与案例相关联。