The aim of this paper is to examine feeling-toned complexes from a developmental psychological perspective. From this perspective feeling-toned complexes emerge when basic needs are not met. A very similar theory is put forward by Jeffery Young in his Schema Therapy (Young, Klosko, & Weishaar 2005). His basic needs concept, developed on the basis of empirical research, covers four basic needs which are: attachment, autonomy, and self-worth, as well as play and spontaneity. My proposition is to deal with this conceptual view from a Jungian perspective insofar as we can integrate the four basic needs, however adding a fifth: the basic need for meaning in the theory of feeling-toned complexes. Emotional schemas and feeling-toned complexes are then comparable patterns. The strengths and weaknesses of Analytic Psychology compared to Jeffrey Young's schema therapy are further discussed. The foundation of the feeling-toned complexes on unmet basic needs lends itself to including a further reference, namely Jaak Panksepp's neuroscientific findings. Panksepp formulates seven basic affective systems which I discuss first, then I focus on what could be gained from the basic needs concept and finally I turn to the feeling-complex in an attempt to integrate neuroscientific findings into complex theory.

中文翻译：

---

基本需要和情结：情调情调、情绪图式和情感状态之间的相似性

这篇论文的目的是从发展心理学的角度来研究感情调和情结。从这个角度来看，当基本需求得不到满足时，情绪性情结就会出现。Jeffery Young 在他的 Schema Therapy (Young, Klosko, & Weishaar 2005) 中提出了一个非常相似的理论。他的基本需求概念是在实证研究的基础上发展起来的，涵盖了四种基本需求：依恋、自主和自我价值，以及游戏和自发性。我的提议是从荣格的角度来处理这个概念性观点，只要我们可以整合四种基本需求，但添加第五种需求：情调复合体理论中对意义的基本需求。情绪图式和情感复合体是可比较的模式。与 Jeffrey Young 的图式疗法相比，分析心理学的优势和劣势将进一步讨论。基于未满足的基本需求的情感复合体的基础有助于包括进一步的参考，即 Jaak Panksepp 的神经科学发现。Panksepp 阐述了我首先讨论的七个基本情感系统，然后我关注可以从基本需求概念中获得什么，最后我转向情感复合体，试图将神经科学的发现整合到复杂理论中。