The paper reviews the course of the controversy surrounding Jung's theory of archetypes beginning in the mid 1990s and continuing to the present. Much of this controversy was concerned with the debate between the essentialism of the evolutionary position of Anthony Stevens as found in his 1983 book Archetypes: A Natural History of the Self, and the emergence model of the archetypes proposed in various publications by Hogenson, Knox and Merchant, among others. The paper then moves on to a consideration of more recent developments in theory, particularly as derived from an examination of the philosopher Gilles Deleuze, who introduces Bergson's somnambulistic unconscious into the discussion of Jung's theories. It is suggested that this largely unexamined influence on Jung may provide answers to some of the unanswered questions surrounding his theorizing. The paper concludes by suggesting that the notion of the somnambulistic unconscious may resemble Atmanspacher's argument for a dual-aspect monism interpretation of Jung.

中文翻译：

---

关于原型概念的争论

这篇论文回顾了围绕荣格原型理论从 1990 年代中期开始并持续到现在的争论过程。大部分争论都与安东尼·史蒂文斯在 1983 年出版的《原型：自我的自然历史》一书中发现的进化立场的本质主义与霍根森、诺克斯和诺克斯等人在各种出版物中提出的原型出现模型之间的辩论有关。商人等等。然后，论文继续考虑最近的理论发展，特别是源自对哲学家吉尔·德勒兹（Gilles Deleuze）的考察，后者将柏格森的梦游无意识引入荣格理论的讨论中。有人认为，这种对荣格的很大程度上未经审查的影响可能会为围绕他的理论化的一些悬而未决的问题提供答案。该论文的结论是暗示梦游无意识的概念可能类似于 Atmanspacher 对荣格的双重方面一元论解释的论证。