During the course of the 2018 IAAP conference, a criticism of Jung's idea of the archetype as inherited predisposition was raised that involved examining a number of dreams and visions and assessing them through developments in genetics and neuroscience. From this comparison it was argued that archetypes cannot be inherited and could more reasonably be argued to derive from early experiences. In this essay, the author responds by showing how this conclusion is flawed due to being based on reductive errors. An alternative, non-reductive but inherited and biological position on the archetype is defended.

中文翻译：

---

对 2018 年 IAAP 原型理论会议的评论：捍卫非还原生物学方法

在 2018 年 IAAP 会议期间，有人批评荣格将原型视为遗传易感性的观点，该观点涉及检查许多梦想和愿景，并通过遗传学和神经科学的发展对其进行评估。从这种比较中可以看出，原型不能被继承，可以更合理地从早期经验中衍生出来。在这篇文章中，作者通过展示这个结论是如何由于基于还原错误而有缺陷来做出回应的。保护原型上的另一种非还原性但遗传和生物学位置。