当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Journal of Analytical Psychology
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Integration versus conflict between schools of dream theory and dreamwork: integrating the psychological core qualities of dreams with the contemporary knowledge of the dreaming brain
Journal of Analytical Psychology Pub Date : 2020-01-23 , DOI: 10.1111/1468-5922.12574 Ole Vedfelt 1
Journal of Analytical Psychology Pub Date : 2020-01-23 , DOI: 10.1111/1468-5922.12574 Ole Vedfelt 1
Affiliation
The various ways schools of psychotherapy relate to dreams have been marked by isolationism and mutual conflict rather than self-examination and then integrating the discoveries and methods of other schools. Jung's method was in opposition to Freud's psychoanalysis. Existential psychology was dismissive of Freud's and Jung's discoveries, while cognitive dream interpretation and cognitive therapy sought other roads entirely. In addition, scientific and neuropsychological dream research has been only insignificantly tied to the psychotherapeutic dream theories. These conflicts and the lack of a comprehensive dream theory has made it convenient for the current rationalist collective consciousness and treatment systems to reject the often times challenging knowledge about ourselves that dreams can provide. This paper describes how contemporary theories of complex cybernetic information networks can create an overriding, constructive framework for uncovering common traits within the above-mentioned branches of dream research and dreamwork. Within this framework, ten core qualities are delineated, supported by both therapeutic knowledge as well as scientific research: 1) Dreams deal with matters important to us; 2) Dreams symbolize; 3) Dreams personify; 4) Dreams are trial runs in a safe place; 5) Dreams are online to unconscious intelligence; 6) Dreams are pattern recognition; 7) Dreams are high level communication; 8) Dreams are condensed information; 9) Dreams are experiences of wholeness; 10) Dreams are psychological energy landscapes. For each core quality I describe short dreamwork sequences from my own practice and a schematic image of how I perceive the overriding interaction between systems in the dreaming brain. For each core quality recommendations for practical dreamwork are provided. Finally, I draw attention to dreams as a huge psychological resource for humankind.
中文翻译:
梦理论流派与梦工作之间的整合与冲突:将梦的心理核心品质与梦脑的当代知识相结合
心理治疗学派与梦相关的各种方式的特点是孤立主义和相互冲突,而不是自我反省,然后整合其他学派的发现和方法。荣格的方法与弗洛伊德的精神分析相反。存在心理学对弗洛伊德和荣格的发现不屑一顾,而认知解梦和认知疗法则完全寻求其他道路。此外,科学和神经心理学梦研究与心理治疗梦理论的联系并不显着。这些冲突和缺乏全面的梦理论使得当前的理性主义集体意识和治疗系统可以方便地拒绝梦可以提供的关于我们自己的经常具有挑战性的知识。本文描述了复杂控制论信息网络的当代理论如何创建一个压倒一切的建设性框架,以揭示上述梦境研究和梦境分支中的共同特征。在这个框架内,十项核心品质被描绘出来,并得到治疗知识和科学研究的支持:1)梦想处理对我们很重要的事情;2)梦想象征;3)梦想的化身;4)梦想是在安全的地方试运行;5)梦在线到无意识智能;6)梦是模式识别;7)梦想是高层次的交流;8)梦是浓缩的信息;9) 梦是完整的体验;10) 梦是心理能量景观。对于每个核心品质,我描述了我自己实践中的简短梦境序列,以及我如何感知做梦大脑中系统之间最重要的相互作用的示意图。为每个核心质量提供实用的梦想工作建议。最后,我提请注意作为人类巨大心理资源的梦。
更新日期:2020-01-23
中文翻译:
梦理论流派与梦工作之间的整合与冲突:将梦的心理核心品质与梦脑的当代知识相结合
心理治疗学派与梦相关的各种方式的特点是孤立主义和相互冲突,而不是自我反省,然后整合其他学派的发现和方法。荣格的方法与弗洛伊德的精神分析相反。存在心理学对弗洛伊德和荣格的发现不屑一顾,而认知解梦和认知疗法则完全寻求其他道路。此外,科学和神经心理学梦研究与心理治疗梦理论的联系并不显着。这些冲突和缺乏全面的梦理论使得当前的理性主义集体意识和治疗系统可以方便地拒绝梦可以提供的关于我们自己的经常具有挑战性的知识。本文描述了复杂控制论信息网络的当代理论如何创建一个压倒一切的建设性框架,以揭示上述梦境研究和梦境分支中的共同特征。在这个框架内,十项核心品质被描绘出来,并得到治疗知识和科学研究的支持:1)梦想处理对我们很重要的事情;2)梦想象征;3)梦想的化身;4)梦想是在安全的地方试运行;5)梦在线到无意识智能;6)梦是模式识别;7)梦想是高层次的交流;8)梦是浓缩的信息;9) 梦是完整的体验;10) 梦是心理能量景观。对于每个核心品质,我描述了我自己实践中的简短梦境序列,以及我如何感知做梦大脑中系统之间最重要的相互作用的示意图。为每个核心质量提供实用的梦想工作建议。最后,我提请注意作为人类巨大心理资源的梦。