This article gives an introductory overview of the papers in this volume originally given at the Joint Conference of the IAAP and the University of Basel, Basel, October 18-20, 2018. The aim of the conference was to bring core concepts of analytical psychology together with theorizing and research from academic sciences, at the very place where Jung started his academic career, the University of Basel. The conference focussed on three fields: the relationship of consciousness and the unconscious and the theory of complexes; the theory of archetypes; and the status of analytical psychotherapy in contemporary psychotherapy research. The aim of the conference was to further the development of theory in analytical psychology in relation to results and insights in contiguous areas of knowledge. In the first area, contributors pointed to the solid evidence especially from the neurosciences for the psychodynamic conceptualizations of the unconscious, and also for the concept of complexes. In contrast to this, the concept of archetypes is controversial, with a majority of contributors questioning Jung's biological conceptualizations of archetypes, and speaking instead for reformulations from the perspective of cultural theory, dynamic systems theory and other approaches. In the field of psychotherapy research, contributors pointed to the profound need for conducting more empirical studies on the outcome of Jungian psychotherapy, but also for a thorough reconsideration of standard research designs in the field.

中文翻译：

---

分析心理学的理论基础：最近的发展和争议

本文对本卷中的论文进行了介绍性概述，这些论文最初是在 2018 年 10 月 18 日至 20 日于 2018 年 10 月 18 日至 20 日在巴塞尔的 IAAP 和巴塞尔大学联合会议上发表的。会议的目的是将分析心理学的核心概念结合在一起凭借学术科学的理论和研究，在荣格开始其学术生涯的地方，巴塞尔大学。会议聚焦三个领域：意识与无意识的关系和复合体理论；原型理论；分析心理治疗在当代心理治疗研究中的地位。会议的目的是进一步发展与相关知识领域的结果和见解相关的分析心理学理论。在第一区，贡献者指出了确凿的证据，尤其是来自神经科学的无意识心理动力学概念化以及复合体概念的确凿证据。与此相反，原型的概念是有争议的，大多数撰稿人质疑荣格对原型的生物学概念化，而是从文化理论、动力系统理论等方法的角度进行重构。在心理治疗研究领域，撰稿人指出，迫切需要对荣格心理治疗的结果进行更多的实证研究，同时也需要彻底重新考虑该领域的标准研究设计。与此相反，原型的概念是有争议的，大多数撰稿人质疑荣格对原型的生物学概念化，而是从文化理论、动力系统理论等方法的角度进行重构。在心理治疗研究领域，撰稿人指出，迫切需要对荣格心理治疗的结果进行更多的实证研究，同时也需要彻底重新考虑该领域的标准研究设计。与此相反，原型的概念是有争议的，大多数撰稿人质疑荣格对原型的生物学概念化，而是从文化理论、动力系统理论等方法的角度进行重构。在心理治疗研究领域，撰稿人指出，迫切需要对荣格心理治疗的结果进行更多的实证研究，同时也需要彻底重新考虑该领域的标准研究设计。