当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Financial Regulation › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Case for Market-Based Stress Tests
Journal of Financial Regulation Pub Date : 2018-10-09 , DOI: 10.1093/jfr/fjz008
John Vickers 1
Affiliation  

I underwent a stress test of a personal kind at 8 o’clock one morning three years ago when I was about to be interviewed on BBC Radio’s Today programme by the formidable John Humphrys. The subject was bank capital requirements, on which I thought the Bank of England had adopted a softer than prudent policy stance.1 A few minutes before the interview, as the news was being read, John Humphrys came into the room where I was waiting and said something like this: “It’s a complicated topic. We need to make it intelligible to the listeners. So is it alright to talk about bank capital as like a pot of money that they keep on one side for a rainy day?”

中文翻译:

基于市场的压力测试的案例

三年前的一个早晨,当我正要接受强大的约翰·汉弗莱斯(John Humphrys)接受BBC电台的今日节目采访时,我接受了一种个人压力测试。主题是银行的资本要求,我以为英格兰银行采取了比审慎的政策立场更为柔和的态度。1采访前几分钟,正读新闻时,约翰·汉弗莱斯进入了我等待的房间,这样说:“这是一个复杂的话题。我们需要让听众理解它。因此,谈论银行资本就像在下雨天把钱放在一边的钱罐一样好吗?”
更新日期:2018-10-09
down
wechat
bug