This study analyses British and Turkish media conceptualizations of the Charlie Hebdo affair. Editorial decisions to republish or not to republish the Mohammed cartoon cover reflected the politico-cultural pressures on the journalistic fields in both countries. The controversy demonstrated that the editorial autonomy of the British media outlets enabled them to engage in ‘eclectic neutrality’, the right to decide to republish or not to republish the cartoons. Despite the severely constrained journalistic environment of Turkey, where expectations of respect for religion take precedence over freedom of expression, the Turkish media engaged in symbolic acts of resistance in furtherance of freedom of expression.

中文翻译：

---

一个元媒体事件，两种形式的审查：英国和土耳其的查理周刊事件

本研究分析了英国和土耳其媒体对查理周刊事件的看法。重新出版或不重新出版穆罕默德卡通封面的编辑决定反映了两国新闻领域的政治文化压力。争议表明，英国媒体的编辑自主权使他们能够从事“折衷中立”，即决定重新发布或不重新发布漫画的权利。尽管土耳其的新闻环境受到严重限制，尊重宗教的期望优先于言论自由，但土耳其媒体仍进行象征性的抵抗行动以促进言论自由。