During the period of reporting (1 October 2019-31 January 2020), six judgments are worth noting in the area of EU social security law. In Safeway, the Court had to decide whether Article 119 of the EC Treaty on equal treatment precluded a measure ending discrimination through the fixing, with retroactive effect, of a uniform normal pension age equal to that of the members within the previously disadvantaged category. In Bocero Torrico, the question related to the obligation on Member States, under Regulation 883/2004, to take into account equivalent benefits acquired in other Member States for the purpose of calculating an early retirement pension. WA concerned a discriminatory law that granted a pension supplement solely to women. UB was about a discriminatory law that granted additional benefits for sportspersons based on their citizenship. In ZP, the question concerned Article 62 of Regulation 883/2004 dealing with the calculation of unemployment benefits. Finally, in Pensions-Sicherungs-Verein, the Court had to interpret Article 8 of Directive 2008/94 in the context of a reduction of pension benefits following the insolvency of the employer.

中文翻译：

---

欧盟法院近期审理的案件概览（2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 1 月）

报告期内（2019年10月1日至2020年1月31日），欧盟社会保障法领域有六项判决值得注意。在 Safeway 案中，法院必须决定《欧共体条约》关于平等待遇的第 119 条是否排除了一项终止歧视的措施，即通过确定具有追溯效力的统一正常退休年龄，与先前处于不利地位的类别中的成员相同。在 Bocero Torrico 案中，问题涉及成员国根据条例 883/2004 有义务考虑在其他成员国获得的同等福利以计算提前退休金。西澳州涉及一项歧视性法律，该法律仅向妇女提供养老金补助。UB 是关于一项歧视性法律，该法律根据其公民身份为运动员提供额外福利。在 ZP 案中，问题涉及第 883/2004 号条例第 62 条关于失业救济金的计算。最后，在 Pensions-Sicherungs-Verein 案中，法院不得不在雇主破产后养老金福利减少的背景下解释第 2008/94 号指令的第 8 条。