points and scales analysing time’s transformation and transformations of time(s); the evident plurality of temporalities and the possibility of historical experience as an experience of past times whose ‘present’ is only given by (im)material sources. This conclusion highlights the main risks and advantages of thinking of time historically presented in this volume. Time in history is undoubtedly an intellectual impertinence – but, as Tamm’s and Olivier’s effort with the topic shows convincingly, it is worthy of note and deeper discussion as time ever was and obviously will remain a key dimension of all historical thinking and practising.

中文翻译：

---

德米特里·特雷宁，俄罗斯

分析时间的变换和时间的变换的点和尺度；时间性的明显多元性和历史经验作为过去时代经验的可能性，其“现在”仅由（非）物质来源给出。这一结论突出了本卷中历史性地思考时间的主要风险和优势。历史上的时间无疑是一种知识上的无礼——但是，正如塔姆和奥利维尔在这个话题上所做的努力令人信服地表明的那样，它值得一提并像时间一样进行更深入的讨论，而且显然将继续成为所有历史思考和实践的关键维度。