当前位置: X-MOL 学术BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Danger zone assessment in small-sided recreational football: providing data for consideration in relation to COVID-19 transmission
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 , DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000911
Morten B Randers , Nikolas Sten Knudsen , Manuel Mounir Demetry Thomasen , Jeppe Panduro , Malte Nejst Larsen , Magni Mohr , Zoran Milanovic , Peter Krustrup , Thomas Bull Andersen

During the COVID-19 pandemic, physical inactivity has increased, and a wide range of sporting activities locked down, with possible long-term implications for public health. Football is the most popular sport worldwide, and recreational football training leads to broad-spectrum health effects. Football is, however, deemed a contact sport with frequent close contact important to consider during COVID-19 pandemic. Objectives This study investigated time spent with close contact (danger zone (DZ) within 1.5 m), number of contacts and time per contact, and compared game formats in recreational small-sided football games for young and adult male football players. Methods Movement analyses were performed on 10 Hz Global Positioning System (GPS) data collected during various small-sided football games prior to the COVID-19 outbreak. Results Time spent in the DZ was 4.3–7.9 s/h per per cent infected players, corresponding to 34.3–114.8 s/h if one player was infected. Number of contacts with one infected player was 23.5–87.7 per hour, with an average contact time of 1.1–1.4 s, and a total number of contacts of 311–691 per hour with all players. 53%–65% of all contacts were shorter than 1 s and 77%–85% shorter than 2 s. Trivial to small effects were found for number of participants and area per player, whereas standard of play and playing with/without boards had no effect. Conclusion This study demonstrated that during small-sided football limited time is spent within DZ and that player contacts are brief. Recreational football may therefore more appropriately be deemed as sporting activity with brief, sporadic contact.

中文翻译:

小面休闲足球的危险区域评估:提供与COVID-19传播相关的数据以供考虑

在COVID-19大流行期间,缺乏运动的现象有所增加,各种各样的体育活动受到限制,这可能对公共健康产生长期影响。足球是全球最受欢迎的运动,而休闲足球训练可带来广谱的健康影响。但是,足球被认为是经常密切接触的一种接触运动,在COVID-19大流行期间很重要。目的这项研究调查了近距离接触(危险区域(DZ)在1.5 m以内)所花费的时间,接触次数和每次接触时间,并比较了青少年和成年男性足球运动员在休闲小边足球比赛中的比赛形式。方法对COVID-19爆发之前在各种小型橄榄球比赛中收集的10 Hz全球定位系统(GPS)数据进行运动分析。结果在DZ中花费的时间为被感染玩家的4.3%/ 7.9 s / h,如果感染一位玩家,则为34.3-114.8 s / h。与一位被感染玩家的接触每小时每小时23.5–87.7,平均接触时间为1.1–1.4 s,所有玩家每小时的平均接触总人数为311–691。所有接触的53%–65%短于1秒,而77%–85%短于2秒。对于参与者的数量和每位玩家的面积,发现微不足道的影响到微小的影响,而游戏的标准和有/没有板的玩法则没有影响。结论这项研究表明,在小型足球比赛中,有限的时间是在DZ内度过的,并且球员之间的联系很短暂。因此,休闲足球可以更恰当地被认为是短暂,零星接触的体育活动。如果一名玩家被感染,则相当于34.3–114.8 s / h。与一位被感染玩家的接触每小时每小时23.5–87.7,平均接触时间为1.1–1.4 s,所有玩家每小时的平均接触总人数为311–691。所有接触的53%–65%短于1秒,而77%–85%短于2秒。对于参与者的数量和每位玩家的面积,发现微不足道的影响到微小的影响,而游戏的标准和有/没有板的玩法则没有影响。结论这项研究表明,在小型足球比赛中,有限的时间是在DZ内度过的,并且球员之间的联系很短暂。因此,休闲足球可以更恰当地被认为是短暂,零星接触的体育活动。如果一名玩家被感染,则相当于34.3–114.8 s / h。与一位被感染玩家的接触每小时每小时23.5–87.7,平均接触时间为1.1–1.4 s,所有玩家每小时的平均接触总人数为311–691。所有接触的53%–65%短于1秒,而77%–85%短于2秒。对于参与者的数量和每位玩家的面积,发现微不足道的影响到微小的影响,而游戏的标准和有/没有板的玩法则没有影响。结论这项研究表明,在小型足球比赛中,有限的时间是在DZ内度过的,并且球员之间的联系很短暂。因此,休闲足球可以更恰当地被认为是短暂,零星接触的体育活动。平均接触时间为1.1–1.4 s,所有玩家每小时的总接触时间为311–691。所有接触的53%–65%短于1秒,而77%–85%短于2秒。对于参与者的数量和每位玩家的面积,发现微不足道的影响到微小的影响,而游戏的标准和有/没有板的玩法则没有影响。结论这项研究表明,在小型足球比赛中,有限的时间是在DZ内度过的,并且球员之间的联系很短暂。因此,休闲足球可以更恰当地被认为是短暂,零星接触的体育活动。平均接触时间为1.1–1.4 s,所有玩家每小时的总接触时间为311–691。所有接触的53%–65%短于1秒,而77%–85%短于2秒。对于参与者的数量和每位玩家的面积,发现微不足道的影响到微小的影响,而游戏的标准和有/没有板的玩法则没有影响。结论这项研究表明,在小型足球比赛中,有限的时间是在DZ内度过的,并且球员之间的联系很短暂。因此,休闲足球可以更恰当地被认为是短暂,零星接触的体育活动。而比赛的标准和有/没有木板的比赛没有影响。结论这项研究表明,在小型足球比赛中,有限的时间是在DZ内度过的,并且球员之间的联系很短暂。因此,休闲足球可以更恰当地被认为是短暂,零星接触的体育活动。而比赛的标准和有/没有木板的比赛没有影响。结论这项研究表明,在小型足球比赛中,有限的时间是在DZ内度过的,并且球员之间的联系很短暂。因此,休闲足球可以更恰当地被认为是短暂,零星接触的体育活动。
更新日期:2021-02-12
down
wechat
bug