Moral issues arise not only when neural technology directly influences and affects people’s lives, but also when the impact of its interventions indirectly conceptualizes the mind in new, and unexpected ways. It is the case that theories of consciousness, theories of subjectivity, and third person perspective on the brain provide rival perspectives addressing the mind. Through a review of these three main approaches to the mind, and particularly as applied to an “extended mind”, the paper identifies a major area of transformation in philosophy of action, which is understood in terms of additional epistemic devices—including a legal perspective of regulating the human–machine interaction and a personality theory of the symbiotic connection between human and machine. I argue this is a new area of concern within philosophy, which will be characterized in terms of self-objectification, which becomes “alienation” following Ernst Kapp’s philosophy of technology. The paper argues that intervening in the brain can affect how we conceptualize the mind and modify its predicaments.

中文翻译：

---

代理，责任，自我和机械思想

道德问题不仅出现在神经技术直接影响和影响人们的生活时，而且当其干预的影响以新的出乎意料的方式间接地将思想概念化时，也会出现道德问题。在这种情况下，意识理论，主观性理论和大脑的第三人称视角提供了解决思维的竞争视角。通过回顾这三种主要的思维方式，特别是对“扩展思维”的运用，本文确定了行动哲学转变的一个主要领域，可以通过其他认知手段（包括法律观点）来理解调节人机交互以及人机共生联系的人格理论。我认为这是哲学界关注的新领域，这将以自我客体化为特征，并根据恩斯特·卡普（Ernst Kapp）的技术哲学变成“异化”。该论文认为，干预大脑会影响我们如何概念化思想并改变其困境。