当前位置: X-MOL 学术Basic Income Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Environmentalism, Ecologism, and Basic Income
Basic Income Studies Pub Date : 2020-03-07 , DOI: 10.1515/bis-2019-0026
Jorge Pinto 1
Affiliation  

Abstract The Greens are the political group in which the support for the implementation of a basic income is stronger. Nevertheless, the reasons for that support are not always clear and quite often not related to environmental issues. For this reason, two different approaches to a green BI – environmental and ecological – are discussed in this article. The first could be part of a green growth strategy, whereas the second would require structural changes to the economic model, in support of a post-productivist economy. Although showing some overlaps, these models are in conflict in some central aspects, such as the role of economic growth in promoting sustainability. For this reason, it might be incorrect to assume that an environmental BI is a step toward an ecological BI. We will focus on the green aspects as a consequence of implementing a BI and independently of its sources of funding – namely by looking into the amount a BI needs to be in order to support shifting activities from the market to the autonomous sphere – and on the green potential of its sources of financing.

中文翻译:

环保主义、生态主义和基本收入

摘要 绿党是对实施基本收入的支持力度较大的政治团体。然而,这种支持的原因并不总是很清楚,而且往往与环境问题无关。出于这个原因,本文讨论了两种不同的绿色 BI 方法——环境和生态。第一个可能是绿色增长战略的一部分,而第二个则需要经济模式的结构性变革,以支持后生产主义经济。尽管显示出一些重叠,但这些模型在一些核心方面存在冲突,例如经济增长在促进可持续性方面的作用。因此,假设环境 BI 是迈向生态 BI 的一步可能是不正确的。
更新日期:2020-03-07
down
wechat
bug