Solving poverty is a laudable public policy goal. While there are many approaches, one that has gained popularity is the conditional cash transfer that requires recipients to satisfy conditions imposed on them such as requiring regular medical checkups. Another approach, which is gaining interest is unconditional cash transfers that do not impose conditions. The question we ask in this paper is: what do these past and current attempts tell us about the implications for gender? To answer this question, we explore two programs using a gendered framework: Brazil's Bolsa Familia,which is a conditional cash transfer, and Manitoba's Mincome experiment, which was an unconditional cash transfer in Canada. We then consider how this information might be used by states, particularly as it relates to ending social marginalization. Broadly, this research contributes to academic discussions of public policy, income, gender and social vulnerability.

中文翻译：

---

有条件和无条件现金转移：对性别的影响

解决贫困是一项值得称赞的公共政策目标。虽然有很多方法，但一种越来越受欢迎的是有条件的现金转移，它要求接受者满足强加于他们的条件，例如需要定期体检。另一种获得兴趣的方法是不附加条件的无条件现金转移。我们在本文中提出的问题是：这些过去和当前的尝试告诉我们关于性别影响的什么？为了回答这个问题，我们使用性别框架探索了两个项目：巴西的 Bolsa Familia，这是一种有条件的现金转移，以及曼尼托巴省的 Mincome 实验，这是一种在加拿大的无条件现金转移。然后我们考虑国家如何使用这些信息，特别是当它与结束社会边缘化有关时。宽广地，