In this paper, we revisit P.Hamb. II 134, which preserves a fragmentary declamation on the familiar aristeus theme, suggest a number of improvements to the text and provide an English translation. We further argue that the speaker in our piece is an aristeus, probably a father, who addresses his son, a deserter, in opposition to recent interpretations that reckon the speaker to be a deserter–father and the addressee to be his aristeus–son. Our interpretation evokes a scenario that is found in Sopater 5.44.27–45.10 Walz. Based on the fragment's content and style, we suggest that either Sopater or his contemporary Libanius could be the author of the lost declamation partially transmitted by this fragment.

在本文中，我们重新审视了 P.Hamb。II 134 保留了对熟悉的aristeus主题的零碎声明，建议对文本进行一些改进并提供英文翻译。我们进一步争辩说，我们文章中的说话者是aristeus，可能是一位父亲，他对他的儿子，一个逃兵讲话，反对最近的解释，认为说话者是一个逃兵父亲，而收件人是他的aristeus 儿子。我们的解释唤起了 Sopater 5.44.27–45.10 Walz 中的一个场景。根据该片段的内容和风格，我们建议 Sopater 或他同时代的 Libanius 可能是该片段部分传递的失传宣言的作者。