ABSTRACT

This article aims to analyse the changes in migration regimes in Sweden over the period 1739–1982. We have chosen to divide this into four periods where each is characterized as a specific regime: the pre-industrial period (1739–1860), the laissez faire period (1860–1932), the rising ambitions period (1932–1951) and the Rehn-Meidner period (1951–1982). These four periods reveal different approaches held by the state regarding labour migration and housing. During the pre-industrial period, rules and regulations hindered mobility and aimed to keep the labour force in agriculture. During the laissez faire period, migration increased, but construction and housing was largely left to the market. During the rising ambitions period, a laissez faire approach was maintained towards migration, but both the government and non-profit organizations became increasingly involved in housing. During the Rehn-Meidner period, internal migration was stimulated, and in the course of ten years, one million homes were built with government support. The differences between the periods are not clear-cut. There were dual and contradictory ideas and policies during each period. This duality provides an important theoretical starting point for this study. Other significant starting points are the long-term perspective taken and the idea that these periods can be analysed as regimes.

摘要

本文旨在分析1739-1982年期间瑞典移民制度的变化。我们选择将其分为四个时期，每个时期都具有特定的制度特征：工业化前时期（1739–1860），自由放任时期（1860–1932），雄心勃勃的时期（1932-1951）和工业化时期。雷恩·迈德纳时期（1951-1982）。这四个时期揭示了国家在劳务移民和住房方面采取的不同方法。在工业化前的时期，规章制度阻碍了人口流动，旨在保持农业劳动力。自由放任期间，移民人数增加了，但建筑和住房大部分留给了市场。在雄心勃勃的雄心勃勃的时期，人们对放任移民采取了放任自流的态度，但是政府和非营利组织都越来越多地参与住房建设。在雷恩·迈德纳（Rehn-Meidner）时期，内部移民得到了刺激，在十年的时间里，在政府的支持下建造了100万套房屋。期间之间的差异不明确。每个时期都有双重和矛盾的思想和政策。这种双重性为这项研究提供了重要的理论起点。其他重要的起点是采取的长期观点以及可以将这些时期作为制度进行分析的想法。每个时期都有双重和矛盾的思想和政策。这种双重性为这项研究提供了重要的理论起点。其他重要的起点是采取的长期观点以及可以将这些时期作为制度进行分析的想法。每个时期都有双重和矛盾的思想和政策。这种双重性为这项研究提供了重要的理论起点。其他重要的起点是采取的长期观点以及可以将这些时期作为制度进行分析的想法。