ABSTRACT In recent decades, a growing body of scholarship has recognised the inappropriateness of conceptualising and representing communicative practices in terms of essentialized codes where different named language-varieties and modalities mutually exclude one another. At the same time, making visible complex practices has resulted in methodologies and representational techniques that, while seeking to “go beyond” boundaries across language-varieties and modalities, may, in fact, deploy and even reinforce such boundaries. Empirical studies across the last 20 years that focus on analyses and representations seeking to contribute to such a “going beyond” agenda are identified and scrutinised here. The concepts of Languaging, and its neologism Translanguaging, are focused upon in this study, with the aim of shedding light on how such a “going beyond” agenda is conceptualised and adopted in the research on Bilingual Education of Deaf Individuals, BEDI. The findings of this systematic search illustrate the fragmentation of the fields related to languaging and BEDI, highlighting that the “going beyond” agenda has, in fact, still not managed to reach beyond its own boundaries in terms of disciplinary epistemologies and ontologies.

中文翻译：

---

关于“超越”语言的有限观点的追求。1997-2018 年在教育科学、语言研究和聋人研究领域的交叉研究

摘要 近几十年来，越来越多的学术团体已经认识到，根据不同的命名语言种类和形式相互排斥的本质化代码来概念化和表示交际实践是不合适的。与此同时，使复杂的实践变得可见，从而产生了方法论和表征技术，虽然试图“超越”跨越语言种类和模式的界限，但实际上可能会部署甚至加强这些界限。过去 20 年的实证研究侧重于旨在为这种“超越”议程做出贡献的分析和陈述，在这里进行了确定和审查。本研究重点关注语言的概念及其新词 Translanguaging，目的是阐明这种“超越”议程是如何在聋人双语教育研究中概念化和采用的，BEDI。这一系统搜索的结果说明了与语言和 BEDI 相关的领域的碎片化，强调“超越”议程实际上在学科认识论和本体论方面仍未能超越其自身的界限。