ABSTRACT This paper examines Martin Heidegger’s own interpretation of Being and Time in the Black Notebooks. The opening part addresses Heidegger’s singular notions of “thinking” and “questioning” which suggest a critically reflective stance, but involve an initiatory call to surrender to the hidden powers of Beyng. The second part addresses Heidegger’s lament in the Black Notebooks that Being and Time has not produced a “great enemy”, and his critique of the initial existentialist or “anthropological” receptions of his magnum opus. The third part looks at how Heidegger’s thought moves beyond Being and Time, in light of the central role the thinker assigns to the German people in repeating the first “inception” of preSocratic thought, in order to overcome the legacies of Roman universalism, and what Heidegger as early as 1932 was calling “Jewish Christianity”. The final part addresses Heidegger’s conception of “the history of Beyng” as it is developed in the Black Notebooks of the early 1940s, from out of the account of “temporality” in Being and Time: a “history” in which Heidegger’s postulation of a need for the “annihilation“ (Vernichtung)” of the essential enemy of the Volk become the lens through which Heidegger can read the Shoah as the “the peak of self-destruction in history”.

中文翻译：

---

超越人类：海德格尔对黑色笔记本中存在与时间的自我阐释

摘要本文探讨了马丁·海德格尔对《黑色笔记本》中“存在与时间”的解释。开头部分论述了海德格尔关于“思考”和“质疑”的奇异概念，这些概念暗示了批判性的反思立场，但涉及到人们主动屈服于Beyng的隐藏力量。第二部分阐述了海德格尔在《黑色笔记本》中的悲哀，即“存在与时间”并没有产生“巨大的敌人”，以及他对最初的存在主义或“人类学”对其巨著的接受的批评。第三部分考察了海德格尔的思想如何超越存在与时间，思想家在重复前苏格拉底思想的第一个“开端”以克服罗马普世主义遗产的过程中赋予德国人民的核心作用，海德格尔早在1932年就将其称为“犹太基督教”。最后一部分论述了海德格尔关于“ Beyng的历史”的概念，该概念在1940年代初的黑色笔记本中得到发展，它是从《存在与时间》中的“暂时性”的角度出发的：一种“历史”，其中海德格尔假设一个“历史”。大众的主要敌人对“歼灭”（Vernichtung）的需要成为海德格尔将肖亚作为“历史上自我毁灭的顶峰”的镜头。