ABSTRACT Iris Marion Young’s influential Social Connections Model (SCM) of responsibility offers a compelling approach to theorizing structural injustice. However, the precise nature of the kind of responsibility modelled by the SCM, along with its relationship to the liability model, has remained unclear. I offer a reading of Young that takes the difference between the liability model and the SCM to be an instance of a more longstanding distinction in the literature on moral responsibility: attributability vs. accountability. I show that interpreting the SCM as a conception of accountability resolves a number of objections, while also highlighting the SCM’s distinctive stance on the relationship between ethics and politics.

中文翻译：

---

我们应对不公有什么样的责任？社会联系模型的道德理论视角

摘要艾里斯·马里昂·杨（Iris Marion Young）的有影响力的社会联系模型（SCM）提供了一种令人信服的方法来对结构性不公正现象进行理论分析。但是，由供应链管理模型化的责任类型的确切性质及其与责任模型的关系仍然不清楚。我读扬一书，认为责任模型和供应链管理之间的差异是道德责任文献中长期存在的区别的一个实例：归因与责任。我表明，将SCM解释为问责制可以解决许多异议，同时也要强调SCM在道德与政治之间关系方面的独特立场。