ABSTRACT This contribution uses an expanded conceptualisation of intervention based on the understanding of it as an attempt to influence, negatively or positively, the political context/direction of a country/situation. It does this through the concept of ‘aid intervention’ in the conflict-context of the occupied Palestinian territory (OPT). Based on over 12 years of research experience of aid donors in this context, this contribution compares the stated principles, as well as the methods and practices, of the main Western (USA and EU) and non-Western (Gulf Arab) states involved in providing aid. It is argued that while there are some interesting differences, there are some striking similarities, thus offering a critique and corrective to the prejudices that underpin the distinctions of ‘Western’ and ‘non-Western’, ‘liberal’ and ‘illiberal’.

中文翻译：

---

在被占领的巴勒斯坦领土上的“援助干预”：海湾阿拉伯捐助者的行为是否与西方捐助者不同？

摘要此贡献基于对干预的理解，将干预的概念扩展为对国家或地区的政治背景/方向的消极或积极影响。它通过在被占领的巴勒斯坦领土（OPT）的冲突背景下的“援助干预”概念来实现这一目标。基于在此背景下超过12年的援助捐助者的研究经验，本文稿比较了参与其中的主要西方国家（美国和欧盟）和非西方国家（海湾阿拉伯）的既定原则以及方法和做法。提供援助。有人认为，虽然存在一些有趣的差异，但也存在一些惊人的相似之处，从而对偏见提供了批判和纠正，这些偏见支撑了“西方”与“非西方”，“自由”和“自由”的区别。