当前位置: X-MOL 学术Scandinavian Journal of History › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Traditional or Modern Peasants? Odelsrett and Bördsrätt in Parliamentary Debates, 1810 – 1860
Scandinavian Journal of History Pub Date : 2020-08-19 , DOI: 10.1080/03468755.2020.1778519
Martin Dackling 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT Under the influence of the Enlightenment, civil legislation was transformed throughout Western Europe in the first half of the 19th century. As part of this, property rights changed, and a more individualized ownership emerged. Since property rights in Sweden and Norway had been characterized by a strong bond between land and family, the legal changes were subject of much political debate in both countries. Debate focused on two legal devices, bördsrätt (in Sweden) and odelsrett (in Norway). Both these emphasized families’ rights to ancestral land holdings. However, the outcomes of the debates differed greatly. Bördsrätt was abolished in Sweden but odelsrett was retained in Norway. This article seeks to explain this divergence by exploring the debates and the differing opinions voiced from 1810 to 1860. The article argues that the divergence should be seen as the result of different peasant strategies. When the preservation of the traditional peasant was in focus in Norway, the Swedish peasantry stood out as more commercialized and, in a sense, more modern.

中文翻译:

传统农民还是现代农民?Odelsrett 和 Bördsrätt 在议会辩论中,1810 – 1860

摘要 在启蒙运动的影响下,19 世纪上半叶整个西欧的民事立法发生了变革。作为其中的一部分,产权发生了变化,出现了更加个性化的所有权。由于瑞典和挪威的财产权以土地和家庭之间的紧密联系为特征,因此法律变更成为两国许多政治辩论的主题。辩论集中在两种法律手段上,bördsrätt(瑞典)和 odelsrett(挪威)。这两者都强调了家庭对祖传土地所有权的权利。然而,辩论的结果却大相径庭。Bördsrätt 在瑞典被废除,但 odelsrett 在挪威保留。本文试图通过探讨 1810 年至 1860 年间的辩论和不同意见来解释这种分歧。文章认为,分歧应被视为不同农民策略的结果。当挪威关注对传统农民的保护时,瑞典农民因更加商业化,在某种意义上更加现代而脱颖而出。
更新日期:2020-08-19
down
wechat
bug