Abstract This paper argues that more explicitly geographical methodologies are required to study twentieth-century internationalism, which invite different conversations between international historians and historical geographers. We show how the form and location of international archival records is itself evidence of multiple, interlocking modes of internationalism which unevenly intersected with national, imperial, and pan-national pasts. This is explored through three case studies: the archive of the International Institute of Intellectual Cooperation (IIIC), located in the UNESCO headquarters in Paris; the Maharaja Ganga Singh Archive in the Indian city of Bikaner; and the papers of Lydia Brown in New Bedford, Massachusetts, a translator and interpreter at the Second Pan-African Congress. We argue that bringing the archives of large international organisations into dialogue with a wider overlooked field of international archival evidence offers new perspectives on what internationalism was, where it happened, and to whom it mattered.

中文翻译：

---

二十世纪国际主义的档案地理学：国家、帝国和种族

摘要 本文认为，研究 20 世纪国际主义需要更明确的地理方法，这引起了国际历史学家和历史地理学家之间的不同对话。我们展示了国际档案记录的形式和位置本身是如何证明国际主义的多重、互锁模式与民族、帝国和泛民族的过去不平衡地交叉。这是通过三个案例研究来探讨的：位于巴黎教科文组织总部的国际知识合作研究所（IIIC）的档案；印度比卡内尔市的 Maharaja Ganga Singh 档案馆；以及马萨诸塞州新贝德福德的 Lydia Brown 的论文，她是第二届泛非大会的翻译。