ABSTRACT The internal armed conflict of Peru (1980–2000), a struggle which saw the rise of various guerrilla movements, notably Shining Path, against the State, left an estimated 69,280 fatalities and countless survivors of human rights violations. Among the victims, particularly toward the end of the conflict, were over 300,000 indigenous, predominantly illiterate, women in impoverished rural communities who had been targeted by State officials and forced into undergoing sterilisation surgeries. To date, no reparation has been enacted in response. This article reviews acts of truth telling, in particular the use of oral testimony within the project of Quipu, of the victims of these enforced sterilisations, as a nonviolent method of historical justice. The article finds that calls for violent social justice (that is, the internal armed conflict) have not protected the rights of the most vulnerable (among them, indigenous women), though arms may have been taken up in an attempt to do so, but have in fact increased the forms of violence within the armed conflict. By contrast, testimony as nonviolent action protects victims’ right to the truth and their right to resist, as it turns against violent histories and toward possible reparation.

中文翻译：

---

秘鲁冲突后赔偿概念化过程中的说真话和作证行为

摘要秘鲁的内部武装冲突（1980-2000 年）是一场斗争，见证了各种游击运动的兴起，尤其是光辉道路，反对国家，估计造成 69,280 人死亡和无数侵犯人权行为的幸存者。在受害者中，特别是在冲突即将结束时，有超过 300,000 名土著妇女，主要是文盲，贫困农村社区的妇女成为国家官员的目标并被迫接受绝育手术。迄今为止，尚未作出任何赔偿作为回应。本文回顾了讲真话的行为，特别是在 Quipu 项目中对这些强制绝育的受害者的口头证词的使用，作为历史正义的非暴力方法。文章发现，要求暴力的社会正义（即，内部武装冲突）没有保护最弱势群体（其中包括土著妇女）的权利，虽然可能有人拿起武器试图这样做，但实际上增加了武装冲突中的暴力形式。相比之下，作为非暴力行动的证词保护受害者了解真相的权利和抵抗的权利，因为它反对暴力历史并寻求可能的赔偿。