当前位置: X-MOL 学术Global Society › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Governing Global Subjects? Border-crossers and the Limits of (Global) Governmentality
Global Society Pub Date : 2020-08-30 , DOI: 10.1080/13600826.2020.1810641
Raffaela Puggioni 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

This article argues that ‘border-crossers' — those still in the process of crossing borders — might not be governable. It suggests to move away from the Foucauldian perspective and investigate border-crossers not through the prism of power relations but through their capacity to dream another future. It argues that we should integrate “how questions” — “how to govern oneself, how to be governed, how to govern others” — with ‘who questions' – that is ‘who is the subject to be governed?' In other words, technologies of control should be discussed together with analyses that investigate the subjects upon whom those technologies operate. Which practices, power relations and institutional settings ‘make up' border-crossers? What if border-crossers are more than the result of power relations? What if what drives mobility is not power relations but by the dream of another future? What if border-crossers are not the liberal subjects of governmentality but the ‘dreaming subjects of mobility’?



中文翻译:

管理全球主题?跨界者和(全球)治理的局限性

摘要

本文认为,“越境者”——那些仍在跨越边界的人——可能无法治理。它建议摆脱福柯的观点,而不是通过权力关系的棱镜,而是通过他们梦想另一个未来的能力来研究跨界者。它认为我们应该把“如何问题”——“如何治理自己、如何被治理、如何治理他人”——与“谁的问题”——即“谁是被治理的主体”结合起来。换言之,控制技术应分析调查这些技术所针对的对象。哪些做法、权力关系和制度设置“构成”了跨界者?如果越界者不仅仅是权力关系的结果呢?如果推动移动的不是权力关系而是另一个未来的梦想呢?如果过境者不是政府的自由主体而是“梦想中的流动主体”怎么办?

更新日期:2020-08-30
down
wechat
bug