Contemporary trajectories of unsustainability and injustice require a profound restructuring of political, economic, and cultural institutions not sufficiently reflected in top-down governance. Diverse bottom-up actors and organizations that attempt to practice and institute more sustainable and just relations, in turn, have to tackle unfavorable conditions and generally lack the resources to take full effect. This paper critically discusses the role of strategy and compromise in facing this cycle of institutional inertia and lack of bottom-up agency. To illustrate its argument, the paper draws on an ethnographic case study on community-led initiatives in Stuttgart (Germany). It traces the ways in which a particular arrangement—an “open workshop”—supports individuals and organizations in their engagement in sustainability-oriented activities while substantiating ethically and socially ambiguous practices. Building on these empirical insights, the paper develops a notion of strategy that revolves around the reflective construction of hybrid but transformative infrastructures to strike a balance between ethical congruency and transformative pragmatism.

中文翻译：

---

混合基础设施：战略和妥协在基层治理中的作用

当代不可持续和不公正的轨迹需要对政治、经济和文化机构进行深刻的重组，而这在自上而下的治理中没有得到充分体现。各种自下而上的行动者和组织试图实践和建立更可持续和公正的关系，反过来，他们必须应对不利条件，并且通常缺乏充分发挥作用的资源。本文批判性地讨论了战略和妥协在面对这种制度惯性和缺乏自下而上的机构的循环中的作用。为了说明其论点，本文借鉴了斯图加特（德国）社区主导倡议的民族志案例研究。它追溯了特定安排——“开放式研讨会”——支持个人和组织参与以可持续发展为导向的活动的方式，同时证实了道德和社会上模棱两可的做法。基于这些实证见解，本文提出了一种战略概念，该概念围绕混合但变革性基础设施的反思性建设，以在道德一致性和变革性实用主义之间取得平衡。