This paper explores entanglements and flows of power, performativity and related becoming subjectivities, in a rich thicket of lived experience in a global bank. The inquiry focuses on an affective auto/ethnographic field text of a mundane, cross-continent, telephone meeting between a senior executive colleague and myself. Experimenting with post-qualitative, transversal, feminist inquiry ‘I’ deliberately plug into multiple, criss-crossing, philosophical concepts of gendered power, performativity and subjectivity. ‘I’ playfully–vulnerably assay with new ways of doing processual organizational research and making knowing–as–action, including with potential readers. ‘I’ write differently, aiming to enact and exemplify the post-qualitative organization studies terrain as unsettled, unsettling and unpredictable. In a processual, abductive interpretation of my field text ‘I’ uncover agential subjectivities emerging from unconscious affective entanglements travelling across continents and disjunctive temporalities and between human and non-human entities. ‘I’ conclude by reflecting on the contributions of my paper and the implications of this inquiry for my practice as an organization studies practitioner–researcher.

本文探讨了全球银行丰富的经验，探讨了权力，绩效和相关的主观性之间的纠缠和交流。该调查的重点是高级行政同事和我之间平凡的，跨大陆的电话会议的情感自动/人种志领域文本。在进行定性，横向，女权主义探究“ I”的实验后，我故意插入了多个关于性别力量，表现力和主观性的纵横交错的哲学概念。“我正在用新的方式来进行过程性组织研究，并与其他潜在读者（包括潜在读者）一起进行行动，从而进行无情的分析。“我”的写法有所不同，旨在制定和举例说明定性后组织研究领域的动荡，动荡和不可预测。在过程中 对我的领域文本“我”的归纳解释揭示了主体意识形态，这种主体性意识形态是由无意识的情感纠缠所产生的，这些情感纠缠遍及各大洲和析取性时空以及人类与非人类实体之间。“我”的结论是反思我的论文的贡献以及这种询问对我作为组织研究从业者—研究者的实践的意义。