当前位置: X-MOL 学术Int. J. Const. Law › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Sticks, carrots, or a hybrid mechanism: The test case of refusal to divorce
International Journal of Constitutional Law ( IF 1.419 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-02 , DOI: 10.1093/icon/moaa065
Benjamin Shmueli 1
Affiliation  

Abstract
Various incentives may be used in order to cause a person to desist from creating negative externalities. Both carrots and sticks have advantages and disadvantages. Literature is familiar with various combinations between them. In most cases, the mechanism is “horizontal”: using carrots with respect to certain parts of the population, and sticks against others. The article presents a novel, vertical mechanism, in the form of a “game” played in two consecutive stages that trap the damager within the mechanism. At the center of the first stage of the mechanism stands a “carrot,” which is money offered for the damager in order for him/her to desist from the evil, combined with a type of a stick, which is a social sanction (shaming). At the center of the second stage, which is activated only if the first stage did not succeed, stands a “stick,” which is a civil action that can be brought against the damager if s/he does not take the carrot offered to him/her in the first stage. The objective: to incentivize a person to engage in fruitful negotiations to end harmful activity at the pre-mechanism stage. To illustrate this, the article draws on negative social behavior of one-sided refusal to give/accept the divorce bill (get) in the Jewish sector the world over. The mechanism will be built primarily on the basis of a few law and economics theories. A dialogue will thus be created with these theories in fields where they are rarely applied. The main argument is that the use of a vertical setup increases efficiency at a minimal additional cost, overcomes a moral problem, and optimally combines the resulting advantages by deploying sticks and carrots, and at the same time neutralizes most of the disadvantages of either of them.


中文翻译:

棍棒,胡萝卜或混合机制:拒绝离婚的测试案例

摘要
可以使用各种激励措施,以使一个人不再产生负面的外部影响。胡萝卜和棍棒都有优点和缺点。文学熟悉它们之间的各种组合。在大多数情况下,这种机制是“水平的”:针对人口的某些部分使用胡萝卜,而对其他部分使用胡萝卜。本文以“游戏”的形式介绍了一种新颖的垂直机制,该游戏在两个连续的阶段进行,将破坏者困在该机制中。该机制第一阶段的中心是“胡萝卜”,这是为破坏者提供的金钱,以使他/她摆脱邪恶,并结合一种棍棒,这是一种社会制裁(假冒行为) )。在第二阶段的中央(仅在第一阶段未成功的情况下才激活),竖立着“摇杆,”,如果他/她在第一阶段不接受提供给他/她的胡萝卜,可以对损害者提起民事诉讼。目标:激励一个人进行富有成果的谈判,以在前机制阶段结束有害活动。为了说明这一点,本文借鉴了世界范围内犹太人一方拒绝给予/接受离婚法案(get)的负面社会行为。该机制将主要基于一些法律和经济学理论来构建。因此,将在很少应用这些领域的理论之间建立对话。主要论点是,垂直布置的使用以最小的额外成本提高了效率,克服了道德上的问题,并通过部署棍棒和胡萝卜来最佳地组合了所产生的优势,
更新日期:2021-02-10
down
wechat
bug