This manuscript presents two studies on arguing goals. In Study 1, participants (N = 147) provided open-ended descriptions of their goals while arguing with others. A content analysis of their answers revealed 10 arguing goals: mutual understanding, problem solving, conflict resolution, persuasion, dominance, personal expression, emotional release, standing up for oneself, enjoyment, and intellectual growth. In Study 2, participants (N = 303) rated statements measuring these goals. The convergent validity, reliability, and factor structure of the measures developed were examined. Results indicated good validity and reliability, as well as unidimensional factors, with strong loadings for indicators in each scale, suggesting a promising measurement for the assessment of goals in nonserial argumentative exchanges.

中文翻译：

---

争论的目标：一种新的测量工具的初步评估

该手稿提出了两个关于争论目标的研究。在研究1中，参与者（N = 147）在与其他人争论时提供了他们目标的开放式描述。对他们的答案的内容分析揭示了10个争论的目标：相互理解，解决问题，解决冲突，说服力，统治力，个人表达，情感释放，自立，享乐和智力成长。在研究2中，参与者（N = 303）对衡量这些目标的陈述进行了评分。研究了所采取措施的收敛有效性，可靠性和因素结构。结果表明良好的效度和可靠性以及一维因素，各个尺度的指标负荷都很大，这表明对非串行辩论性交流中目标评估的一种有希望的衡量方法。