Global data protection laws can be described, at best, as contradictory in philosophy and practice. The 2015 decision by the Court of Justice for the European Union declaring the mechanism for data transfer between the United States and European Union known as “Safe Harbor” invalid and the criticism of its replacement, Privacy Shield, is representative of the conflict in this area. Such contention often stems from the differences in privacy rationales and theories of the United States and European Union. This article examines the recent developments in data protection regulations, and makes the argument that issues such as data protection, and specifically data shared with intelligence agencies, should be analyzed through the privacy principle of dignity and that the law of confidentiality should be applied to data protection cases, thereby instilling more harmony into the data privacy approaches of the United States and the European Union.

中文翻译：

---

恢复尊严与和谐至美国-欧盟数据保护条例

全球数据保护法充其量在哲学和实践上是矛盾的。欧盟法院2015年的决定宣布了美国与欧盟之间被称为“安全港”无效的数据传输机制，而对其替代品“隐私盾”的批评则代表了这一领域的冲突。这种争论通常源于美国和欧盟在隐私理论和理论上的差异。本文考察了数据保护法规的最新发展，并提出了这样的论点，即应通过有尊严的隐私原则来分析数据保护等问题，特别是与情报机构共享的数据，并应将保密法应用于数据保护套