Freedom of speech and the press have become increasingly international and comparative for communication law scholars and practitioners. For those of us who have witnessed the internet revolution of communication since the mid-1990s, this comes as no surprise. As Columbia University President Lee C. Bollinger, a noted First Amendment scholar, observed in 2010: “No longer can we divide the world into what happens with press freedom in our own country and then view what happens in the rest of the world as ‘human rights.’” Two years later, in a 2021 Spindle Law interview, David McCraw, deputy general counsel at the New York Times, suggested that those

中文翻译：

---

国际法和比较法作为传播法的反面视角

言论自由和新闻自由已变得越来越国际化，对于通讯法学者和从业者而言，比较自由。对于自1990年代中期以来目睹通信互联网革命的那些人来说，这不足为奇。正如哥伦比亚大学的校长李·博林格（Lee C. Bollinger），一位著名的《第一修正案》学者在2010年观察到的那样：“我们再也不能将世界划分为我们国家的新闻自由，然后再将世界其他地方视为”两年后，在2021年《主轴法》的采访中，《纽约时报》副总顾问戴维·麦考罗（David McCraw）建议