ABSTRACT This article employs a strategy of “adversarial reading,” seeking to find complexity and contradiction in the seemingly monologic epilogue to Crime and Punishment. Since the novel’s most resistant and perverse interpreters, and in particular Svidrigailov, have vanished from the text prior to the opening of the epilogue, it is the reader’s challenge to carry forward these characters’ approach to textual interpretation and keep alive the novel’s rejection of transparent, perfectly adequate denotation. Heuristically, this article asks what readers might find in the epilogue if they refuse to remain the passive recipients of Sonia’s word.

中文翻译：

---

“这几乎有些简陋的东西……” –认真阅读《犯罪与惩罚》的尾声

摘要本文采用“对抗性阅读”策略，力图在看似犯罪和惩罚的单一论结语中找到复杂性和矛盾性。由于小说的最顽强，最反常的解释者，尤其是西维德里盖洛夫，在结语开头之前就已经从文本中消失了，这是读者面临的挑战，即如何弘扬这些人物的文本解释方法，并保持小说拒绝透明的表现。 ，完全足够的表示形式。试探性地，这篇文章问读者，如果读者拒绝成为索尼亚语的被动接受者，他们可能会在结语中找到什么。