clearer in explaining the terminology and concepts. A list of the terminology they use with a clear reference to the articles in which these were discussed would not only have been helpful, but is indispensable. Another disappointing deficiency, in particular for a scholarly publication, is the poor annotation, the lack of an index and the absence of a comprehensive list of references. Then it would for instance also have been immediately clear that the literature used, with a few exceptions, predominantly dates from before 2015, which is a bit remarkable for such an advanced topic. To conclude, in terms of content it is a valuable book which should have been given more attention before it was sent to the publishing house. This missed opportunity is likely to have a negative effect on reception and immediate impact of these important ideas among practitioners. Nevertheless, the book deserves to be read and the ideas to be digested and translated into practical solutions.

中文翻译：

---

档案实践史，第一版，

更清楚地解释术语和概念。列出他们使用的术语并明确提及讨论这些术语的文章不仅会有所帮助，而且必不可少。另一个令人失望的不足，特别是对于学术出版物而言，是注释不完善、缺乏索引和没有完整的参考文献列表。然后，例如，使用的文献也很明显，除了少数例外，主要是 2015 年之前的，这对于这样一个高级主题来说有点值得注意。总而言之，就内容而言，这是一本有价值的书，在送到出版社之前应该得到更多关注。这种错失的机会可能会对从业者中这些重要思想的接受和直接影响产生负面影响。尽管如此，这本书值得一读，其中的想法值得消化并转化为实际的解决方案。