ABSTRACT This paper discusses ways in which literary representations of senderistas strive to humanise the figure of the necropolitically-defined state ‘enemy’ and do so within the broad moment of neoliberal consensus-building around the friend-enemy division in Peru. Drawing on Achille Mbembe's reformulation of biopolitics, the paper offers close readings of Vargas Llosa’s Lituma en los Andes (1994) and Roncagliolo’s Abril rojo (2006). Where Vargas Llosa’s rehumanising of the individual senderista leaves the absolutely enmity of Sendero Luminoso as ‘terror’ intact, Roncagliolo recasts the senderista as an irreducibly complex subject defined as much as victim as perpetrator of violence.

中文翻译：

---

安第斯山脉的墓地政治：在两部秘鲁小说中将 Senderista 解读为主权主体或主权主体

摘要 本文讨论了寄信者的文学表现如何努力使死灵政治定义的国家“敌人”形象人性化，并在围绕秘鲁敌友分裂的新自由主义共识建立的广泛时刻内这样做。该论文借鉴了 Achille Mbembe 对生命政治的重新表述，提供了对 Vargas Llosa 的 Lituma en los Andes (1994) 和 Roncagliolo 的 Abril rojo (2006) 的仔细阅读。Vargas Llosa 对个别发送者的重新人性化使 Sendero Luminoso 的绝对敌意完全保留为“恐怖”，而 Roncagliolo 将发送者重新塑造为一个不可简化的复杂主体，既被定义为受害者，又被定义为暴力的肇事者。