ABSTRACT In January 2018, a feminist blog, babe, detailed an anonymous woman’s date with comedian Aziz Ansari, ending with her accusation that he had sexually assaulted her by escalating his sexual advances despite her verbal and nonverbal objections. Online reaction to the babe article was swift and plentiful, including a New York Times editorial written by conservative provocateur Bari Weiss entitled, “Aziz Ansari is Guilty. Of Not Being a Mind Reader.” Weiss’ piece drew 2953 online responses before the comment section closed the next day, with wide-ranging views addressing the respective behaviors and motivations of Ansari, “Grace,” and Weiss. The responses provide an opportunity to explore how commenters negotiate the boundaries of the #MeToo movement in the venue that had ignited the movement’s resurgence with the story of movie mogul Harvey Weinstein’s longstanding sexual abuse of women working in the film industry. This study applies quantitative and qualitative analysis to comment discourse and elicits three major themes: (1) expectations for seeking or conveying consent, (2) criteria for publicizing the private, and (3) demarcations between insensitivity and abuse. Justifications frequently offered for the positions articulated were based on references to personal experience, cultural expectations, the #MeToo movement, and feminism.

中文翻译：

---

名人抨击或#MeToo 贡献？纽约时报在线读者争论标签女权主义的界限

摘要 2018 年 1 月，一个女权主义博客 babe 详细描述了一位匿名女性与喜剧演员阿齐兹·安萨里的约会，最后她指控他不顾她的口头和非口头反对，通过升级他的性侵犯来对她进行性侵犯。对宝贝文章的在线反应迅速而丰富，包括由保守派挑衅者巴里韦斯撰写的纽约时报社论，题为“阿齐兹安萨里有罪。不是一个读心者。” Weiss 的文章在第二天评论部分关闭之前吸引了 2953 条在线回复，针对 Ansari、“Grace”和 Weiss 各自的行为和动机提出了广泛的观点。这些回应提供了一个机会，可以探索评论者如何在场地内协商#MeToo 运动的界限，该运动通过电影大亨哈维·温斯坦 (Harvey Weinstein) 长期对电影业女性进行性虐待的故事点燃了该运动的复兴。本研究将定量和定性分析应用于评论话语并引出三个主要主题：（1）寻求或传达同意的期望，（2）公开私人的标准，以及（3）不敏感和滥用之间的界限。经常为所阐明的立场提供的理由是基于对个人经历、文化期望、#MeToo 运动和女权主义的引用。本研究将定量和定性分析应用于评论话语并引出三个主要主题：（1）寻求或传达同意的期望，（2）公开私人的标准，以及（3）不敏感和滥用之间的界限。经常为所阐明的立场提供的理由是基于对个人经历、文化期望、#MeToo 运动和女权主义的引用。本研究将定量和定性分析应用于评论话语并引出三个主要主题：（1）寻求或传达同意的期望，（2）公开私人的标准，以及（3）不敏感和滥用之间的界限。经常为所阐明的立场提供的理由是基于对个人经历、文化期望、#MeToo 运动和女权主义的引用。