Meta-reviews of the third-person effect literature explain that scholars have assumed that certain messages are desirable or undesirable. In response, this study examines messages that vary in their social desirability so that we can better understand the specific characteristics of socially (un)desirable messages, how people account for changes in their perceptions of a message’s desirability, and the resulting behaviors from those perceptions.

中文翻译：

---

第三人称效果奖学金中信息可取性的错误二分法

对第三人称效果文学的元评论解释说，学者们假设某些信息是可取或不可取的。作为回应，本研究研究了社会期望程度各异的消息，以便我们可以更好地理解社会（不良）消息的特定特征，人们如何解释其对消息期望程度的看法以及由此产生的行为。