Abstract Not once does Winckelmann use the word ‘classical’ or any of its derivatives ‘classicism’, ‘neo-classicism’, ‘classicity’. And yet nobody’s œuvre is, or has been, more closely associated with the concept of the classical than his. By the second half of the nineteenth century, at the latest, it is regularly subsumed under the concept of the classical or classicism: a categorization that in the twentieth century has become the norm in all European countries and languages. How valid is this categorization? To what extent can a body of work that manages without the word ‘classical’ be brought under that heading? The present article suggests some answers to this question.

中文翻译：

---

在规范与历史之间：温克尔曼的艺术史学与古典概念

摘要Winckelmann从未使用过“古典”一词或其任何派生词“古典主义”，“新古典主义”，“古典性”。然而，没有人的尝试与现在相比已经或曾经与古典概念更紧密地联系在一起。最迟到19世纪下半叶，它通常被归入古典或古典主义的概念：在20世纪，这种分类已成为所有欧洲国家和语言的规范。此分类的有效性如何？如果没有“古典”一词管理的工作可以带到什么程度？本文为这个问题提出了一些答案。