当前位置: X-MOL 学术Publications of the English Goethe Society › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The German Beast Unleashed: Kleist’s Hermannsschlacht and the Suspension of 'Human Rights' in the Era of Nationalism
Publications of the English Goethe Society Pub Date : 2018-01-02 , DOI: 10.1080/09593683.2018.1433479
Claudia Nitschke 1
Affiliation  

Abstract This article scrutinises the aporetic confrontation of different ultimate values in Kleist’s infamous Die Hermannsschlacht, namely nationalism and a basic notion of ‘human rights’. Kleist’s play does not settle for one of these priorities, but conceptualizes the nation as a facilitator, promulgator, and protector of rights and — at the very same time — as an inexorable principle of selection which ties the notions of exclusion and elimination closely to those of inclusion and participation. In this respect, Die Hermannsschlacht not only prepares and anticipates elements of Carl Schmitt’s political theory, but also comes very close to Giorgio Agamben’s analysis of sovereignty and the production of politically qualified life in his Homo Sacer series. However, it does so without completely abandoning the universal ideas of human rights.

中文翻译:

释放的德国野兽:克莱斯特的赫尔曼施拉赫特和民族主义时代中“人权”的停权

摘要本文详细考察了克莱斯特臭名昭著的《代尔·赫尔曼施莱茨》中不同终极价值的外交对抗,即民族主义和“人权”的基本概念。克莱斯特的戏剧并不能满足这些优先事项之一,而是将国家概念化为权利的促进者,传播者和保护者,同时,又将其作为一种必然选择原则,将排他性和消灭性概念与那些概念紧密联系在一起。参与和参与。在这方面,Die Hermannsschlacht不仅准备并预见了卡尔·施密特(Carl Schmitt)的政治理论的内容,而且非常接近乔治·阿甘本(Giorgio Agamben)在他的“智者”系列中对主权和政治上合格的生活的分析。但是,这样做并没有完全放弃普遍的人权观念。
更新日期:2018-01-02
down
wechat
bug