ABSTRACT Death as an inevitable reality is a subject of study in various philosophical schools. This concept can be reviewed within three realms: semantics, ontology, and epistemology. The objective of this article is to examine death within the ontological realm in the thoughts of Mullā Sadrā and Schopenhauer, and it attempts to answer the question whether philosophical discussions on the concept of death in Sadrā’s transcendental wisdom, despite differences in principles, methods, and objectives, are comparable to Schopenhauer’s intellectual framework. Using a descriptive-analytical approach, the present study first investigates the issue of death in the thought of both philosophers and then focuses on their comparative analysis. The findings of this study show that both philosophers believe in the dichotomy in the world, immortality of human nature after death, existence of suffering in the world, asceticism, austerity, love, and affection to all human beings. However, each of them analyzes and explains the issue of death within his own intellectual framework.

中文翻译：

---

穆拉·萨德拉（MullāSadrā）和叔本华（Schopenhauer）哲学中的死亡

摘要死亡是不可避免的现实，是各种哲学学校的研究主题。可以在三个领域中审查此概念：语义，本体论和认识论。本文的目的是检验毛拉·萨德拉（MullāSadrā）和叔本华（Schopenhauer）思想在本体论领域内的死亡，并试图回答一个问题，即尽管原理，方法和思想上存在差异，但萨德拉的先验智慧中是否存在关于死亡概念的哲学讨论。目标，可以与叔本华的知识框架相提并论。本研究使用描述性分析方法，首先研究了两位哲学家思想中的死亡问题，然后着重于他们的比较分析。这项研究的结果表明，两位哲学家都相信世界上的二分法，死亡后人性永垂不朽，世界上存在苦难，禁欲主义，紧缩，爱心和对所有人的关爱。但是，他们每个人都在自己的智力框架内分析和解释了死亡问题。