Abstract In this paper I propose a series of arguments in order to show that it is preferable for analytic philosophy to be practiced in different languages. In the first section, I show that the analytic tradition includes people developing their philosophical work in different natural languages. In the second section, I will address the question of the role of language in thought, and more specifically in philosophical thought, concluding that it is preferable to allow for the use of different languages as a vehicle for philosophical ideas. Finally, I make some suggestions regarding changes that could be made in academic practices to better allow a plurality of languages and voices within the analytic tradition.

中文翻译：

---

分析传统的语言

摘要在本文中，我提出了一系列论证，以表明分析哲学最好以不同的语言来实践。在第一部分中，我展示了分析传统包括人们使用不同的自然语言发展其哲学著作的过程。在第二部分中，我将讨论语言在思想中，尤其是在哲学思想中的作用的问题，并得出结论，最好允许使用不同的语言作为哲学思想的载体。最后，我对可以在学术实践中进行的更改提出了一些建议，以更好地允许分析传统中包含多种语言和声音。