ABSTRACT Considering the increasing participation of non-native English speaker (NNES) writers in international publications, the rhetorical organization of their research articles (RAs) keeps receiving ample attention from researchers of English for academic purposes. However, the issue is understudied among NNES novice writers. This study examines the rhetorical organization of academic argumentation in 113 Indonesian English education undergraduate students' iterative findings and discussion sections using a move analysis method. The findings demonstrated that the conformity manifestations of the comments move were exhibited in interpreting results and comparing results with previous literature. The non-conformity manifestations exemplified the limited manifestations of dissimilarities with previous research and the absence of explanation after claims were made. This caused an absence of criticality as the fundamental element of RA writing. Moreover, several grammar-related and idea-related errors occurred in most steps. Hence, recommendations for the pedagogy of English for research publication purposes and future research are presented.

中文翻译：

---

非母语为英语的新手作家撰写的研究文章“发现和讨论”部分的论证结构：以印度尼西亚本科生为例

摘要考虑到非英语母语 (NNES) 作家越来越多地参与国际出版物，他们的研究文章 (RA) 的修辞组织一直受到英语研究人员出于学术目的的充分关注。然而，这个问题在 NNES 新手作家中没有得到充分研究。本研究采用移动分析法，对 113 名印尼英语教育本科生的迭代发现和讨论部分中学术论证的修辞组织进行了检验。研究结果表明，评论动作的一致性表现在对结果的解释和与先前文献的比较中。不符合项的表现体现了与先前研究的不同之处的有限表现以及提出索赔后缺乏解释。这导致缺乏关键性作为 RA 写作的基本要素。此外，在大多数步骤中出现了几个与语法相关和与想法相关的错误。因此，提出了用于研究出版目的和未来研究的英语教学法的建议。