当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Aesthetic Horizons: A Phenomenologically Motivated Critique of Zuidervaart
Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology Pub Date : 2016-01-02 , DOI: 10.1080/20539320.2016.1187853
Eric Chelstrom 1
Affiliation  

Abstract One of the more ambitious and yet fruitful attempts in recent years to untangle general questions about the nature of aesthetic phenomena and their socially constituted nature rests in Lambert Zuidervaart’s critical hermeneutical theory of artistic truth. In this paper, I explore one part of Zuidervaart’s project, namely his conception of “aesthetic validity as a horizon of imaginative cogency.” I seek to develop Zuidervaart’s conception by bringing his thesis into dialogue with phenomenological analyses of “horizon” and the collective intentional approach to institutional and social objects. Zuidervaart relies primarily on Gadamer’s view of horizon, but does not offer very much by way of clarification as to exactly what a horizon is. Phenomenological analysis of horizon should serve to add content to the idea of horizon. I contend that the Husserlian notion is both more informative and has more utility for Zuidervaart’s project.

中文翻译:

审美视野:Zuidervaart的现象学动机批判

摘要兰伯特·祖德瓦(Lambert Zuidervaart)的批判性艺术真理诠释理论是近年来提出的,雄心勃勃但富有成果的尝试之一,旨在解开关于美学现象的本质及其社会构成的本质的一般性问题。在本文中,我探讨了Zuidervaart的项目的一部分,即他的“审美有效性作为想象力的视界”的概念。我试图通过将Zuidervaart的论文与对“地平线”的现象学分析以及针对制度和社会对象的集体故意方法进行对话,来发展Zuidervaart的概念。Zuidervaart主要依赖于Gadamer的视野观点,但没有提供太多关于视野到底是什么的澄清。地平线的现象学分析应该为地平线的概念增加内容。
更新日期:2016-01-02
down
wechat
bug