quantum mechanics’ (David Mermin). We can also find in this book clear attempts to vindicate Bohr’s thinking from an experimental point of view. It is thus argued that experiments such as the one carried out by Shahriar S. Afshar in 2004, in which particle and wave properties coexist, should not be interpreted as a refutation of the framework of complementarity (Kauark-Leite). Likewise, a technological understanding (in the wider sense, not only experimental) of quantum electrodynamics and quantum field theory in ‘the spirit of Copenhagen’, whose culmination would be the discovery, in the twenty-first century, of the Higgs boson (Plotnitsky), is also posited. On the other hand, complementarity, understood as a methodological guide and not in metaphysical terms, could help reach a better explanation of the quantum tunnelling phenomenon (Perović). Ultimately, we find ourselves before a highly recommended work, not only for all those who take an interest in fields located at the frontier between theoretical physics and philosophy of physics, but also, and even more so, for those who believe that metaempirical questions, philosophical or however they are named, have no role in the understanding of physics or the natural sciences in general.

中文翻译：

---

作为社会存在的科学：海德格尔与科学知识社会学

量子力学（David Mermin）。在本书中，我们还可以找到明确的尝试，从实验的角度证明玻尔的思想。因此，有人认为诸如沙赫里亚尔·阿夫沙尔（Shahriar S. Afshar）在2004年进行的实验（其中粒子和波动性质并存）不应被解释为对互补性框架的反驳（Kauark-Leite）。同样，在“哥本哈根精神”中对量子电动力学和量子场论进行了技术理解（广义上来说，不仅是实验性的），其高潮将是在二十世纪发现希格斯玻色子（Plotnitsky） ），也被放置。另一方面，互补性被理解为方法论的指导，而不是形而上学的术语，可以帮助更好地解释量子隧穿现象（Perović）。