account fares with respect to such different theories as those of Hempel, Lewis, Salmon, and Woodward and Hitchcock. But there is much more to the proper evaluation of Skow’s ideas. I have no doubts that Reasons Why is going to attract the attention of philosophers of science as well as other scholars who have been interested in ‘theories of explanation’. And rightfully so. This is definitely a book that anyone interested in the discussion of causal and non-causal explanations will have to read if they aim to contribute to the topic.

中文翻译：

---

经历时间

关于Hempel，Lewis，Salmon，Woodward和Hitchcock等不同理论的票价。但是，正确评估Skow的思想还有很多。我毫不怀疑，理由为什么会吸引科学哲学家以及对“解释理论”感兴趣的其他学者的注意力。当然是这样。这绝对是一本对因果关系和非因果关系的解释感兴趣的人，如果他们打算为该主题做出贡献，则必须阅读。