one of his other books. This is unfortunate as it is exactly this philosophy of language that is supposed to get rid of the myth of information as a natural object. Thus, we are in principle being asked to accept a solution based on a language-philosophical foundation that we cannot properly evaluate. That is ironic in a philosophical analysis of the consequences of tacit (and misguided) philosophical foundations. However, the brilliance of What Is Information? lies in Janich’s endeavour to reconceptualise information as a cultural construct. For Janich, the ultimate mistake in philosophy of science is the decoupling of information and culture. The theorisation of information as a natural object decouples information from the cultural practice of communication that is information’s actual origin. As Janich puts it,

中文翻译：

---

几何：基础第三本书

他的另一本书。这是不幸的，因为正是这种语言哲学被认为摆脱了自然而然的信息神话。因此，原则上要求我们接受基于我们无法适当评估的语言哲学基础的解决方案。在对隐性（和误导）哲学基础的后果进行哲学分析时，这具有讽刺意味。但是，“什么是信息”的光彩呢？在于贾尼奇（Janich）将信息重新概念化为一种文化建构的努力。对于贾尼希（Janich）而言，科学哲学的最终错误是信息与文化的脱钩。信息作为自然对象的理论化使信息与作为信息实际来源的传播文化实践脱钩。正如Janich所说，