ABSTRACT The main reference for twentieth century politics is the Nation-state, whose territory-citizens were the unique and only target of norm production. Furthermore, the function of norm production was commitment of public bodies, whose legitimacy – at least in democratic countries – depends on the ‘people’. i.e. the citizens that were the target of the law production itself. An important fact, is that national production of norms slowly shifted from the legislative to the executive power. Too many were the decisions to be made in a brief term, and too fast were people’s emotional reactions, to let this commitment to an impersonal and procedural institution like the legislative power. In a globalized world, things have changed under many aspects. The multiplicity of decisional levels, e.g.: on one side, supranational bodies and entity are more and more frequently assuming this function; furthermore, more and more frequently, national commitments have shifted towards more restricted levels, such as regions or cities. Even the target has turned much more complex: due to more and more massive migration phenomena, all national law makings are nowadays affecting large groups of people, who are not citizens, while citizens are often subjected to other countries’ legislation. Among the main consequences, is that decision-making process have untied from contingent popular reactions and it is possible now to base upon legislative processes, a long-term perspective and a global scale. This paper aims at showing this scenario consequences for innovation processes. Namely, it is possible now to set an environment for innovation by enhancing exchanges of ideas, competences and information is the result of innovation processes, no matter if social or technological. In other words, their work will aim not only at comprehending the process of law-making in the global era, but also proposing models for law-making activities that grant the best environment possible for innovation processes, i.e. free circulation of ideas, science and people.

中文翻译：

---

立法创新。走向全球法律。制作过程：全球公民政策建模案例

摘要 20 世纪政治的主要参照物是民族国家，其领土公民是规范生产的唯一对象。此外，规范生产的功能是公共机构的承诺，其合法性——至少在民主国家——取决于“人民”。即公民是法律生产本身的目标。一个重要的事实是，国家规范的制定慢慢地从立法权转向了行政权。在短期内做出的决定太多，人们的情绪反应太快，以至于无法将这种承诺交给像立法权这样的非个人和程序机构。在全球化的世界里，很多方面都发生了变化。决策层的多样性，例如：一方面，超国家机构和实体越来越频繁地承担这一职能；此外，国家承诺越来越频繁地转向更受限制的水平，例如区域或城市。甚至目标也变得更加复杂：由于越来越多的大规模移民现象，现在所有国家立法都影响到非公民的大量人群，而公民往往受到其他国家立法的约束。主要后果之一是，决策过程已经脱离了偶然的大众反应，现在可以基于立法程序、长期视角和全球范围。本文旨在展示这种情景对创新过程的影响。即，现在可以通过加强思想、能力和信息的交流来营造创新环境，这是创新过程的结果，无论是社会的还是技术的。换言之，他们的工作不仅旨在理解全球时代的立法过程，而且还将提出立法活动模式，为创新过程提供最佳环境，即思想、科学和技术的自由流通。人们。